Obstructive mother can be fined if she obstructs relations between her son and the father she separated from. The Supreme Court in its ruling No. 4176 of Feb. 21, 2014, ruled that the separated mother who obstructs the meetings, established…
No separation charge in case of "platonic infidelity" According to the Supreme Court, a platonic affair undertaken on the web is not necessarily cause for a separation charge. This was made clear by the Supreme Court in ruling no. 8929…
Rivals in love, one scratch is enough and the offense of injury is triggered. The Supreme Court in ruling no. 51393 of Dec. 19, 2013 ruled that even a very minor scratch caused to one's love rival during an argument…
Wife suffering from compulsive shopping can be charged for separation The Supreme Court, in ruling no. 25842 of Nov. 18, 2013, affirmed that it is possible to charge the separation to the spouse suffering from "compulsive shopping" because although it…
Husband cannot break into ex-wife's home The Supreme Court in ruling no. 6377 of Feb. 16, 2010, ruled that the conduct engaged in by an ex-husband who breaks into his ex-wife's home to steal, photocopy and then return documents to…
The use of a bark collar is animal abuse In its ruling No. 38034/2013, the Supreme Court affirmed that the use of a bark collar is to be considered a violation of a dog's freedom. In fact, the Supreme Court…
Parental duty to support children who have attained the age of majority. The Supreme Court in ruling no. 20137 of Sept. 3, 2013, ruled that the parent recognized as the natural father by the court, following the action taken by…
Ex-wife who starts a cohabitation with another man in the same apartment does not lose the allocation of the marital home The Supreme Court of Civil Cassation in ruling no. 15753 of June 24, 2013 confirmed the assignment of the…
Charge of separation to arrogant husband The Supreme Court in ruling no. 1239/2013 affirmed that the arrogant attitude of the unfaithful husband, toward his sick wife, can also be valid grounds for charging the separation. Moreover, the man had also…
Restaurant playground, no duty of supervision for the manager The Supreme Court in its May 21, 2013, ruling no. 12401, clarified that the owner of a restaurant that provides a perfectly good playground for young children is not obliged to…