<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo</provider_name><provider_url>https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/</provider_url><author_name>Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo</author_name><author_url>https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/author/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo/</author_url><title>News Supreme Court rulings August 2013 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="mY8zAsITrf"&gt;&lt;a href="https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/news-supreme-court-rulings-august-2013/"&gt;News Supreme Court rulings August 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/news-supreme-court-rulings-august-2013/embed/#?secret=mY8zAsITrf" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;News Supreme Court rulings August 2013&#x201D; &#x2014; Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo" data-secret="mY8zAsITrf" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Ex-wife who starts a cohabitation with another man in the same apartment does not lose the allocation of the marital home The Supreme Court of Civil Cassation in ruling no. 15753 of June 24, 2013 confirmed the assignment of the marital home, co-owned by the former spouses, to theex-wife , although the latter had entered [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
