1.0Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolohttps://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolohttps://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/author/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo/rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="r5l1mDHlWa"><a href="https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2013/">News Supreme Court rulings December 2013</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2013/embed/#?secret=r5l1mDHlWa" width="600" height="338" title="“News Supreme Court rulings December 2013” — Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo" data-secret="r5l1mDHlWa" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script> /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); </script> Wife suffering from compulsive shopping can be charged for separation The Supreme Court, in ruling no. 25842 of Nov. 18, 2013, affirmed that it is possible to charge the separation to the spouse suffering from “compulsive shopping” because although it is a pathology that results in a personality disorder, it does not exclude the fault […]