1.0Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolohttps://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolohttps://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/author/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo/rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="wZFyyiHQfB"><a href="https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/news-supreme-court-rulings-july-2013/">News Supreme Court rulings July 2013</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/news-supreme-court-rulings-july-2013/embed/#?secret=wZFyyiHQfB" width="600" height="338" title="“News Supreme Court rulings July 2013” — Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo" data-secret="wZFyyiHQfB" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script> /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); </script> Charge of separation to arrogant husband The Supreme Court in ruling no. 1239/2013 affirmed that the arrogant attitude of the unfaithful husband, toward his sick wife, can also be valid grounds for charging the separation. Moreover, the man had also left the marital home without providing valid evidence that the marital crisis was to be […]