1.0Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolohttps://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolohttps://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/author/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo/rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="10aYotuaIg"><a href="https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/news-supreme-court-rulings-july-2016/">News Supreme Court rulings July 2016</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/news-supreme-court-rulings-july-2016/embed/#?secret=10aYotuaIg" width="600" height="338" title="“News Supreme Court rulings July 2016” — Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo" data-secret="10aYotuaIg" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script> /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); </script> Disco too noisy? Neighbors always compensated. Damage to health is presumed The Supreme Court, in ruling no. 13208/2016, ruled that the discotheque that causes harm to neighbors with noise immissions exceeding normal tolerability is liable for compensation regardless of proof of harm. Indeed, the courts of legitimacy have clarified that, for the purposes of compensation […]