<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo</provider_name><provider_url>https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/</provider_url><author_name>Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo</author_name><author_url>https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/author/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo/</author_url><title>The retention exception | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="4lzJLgFUd8"&gt;&lt;a href="https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/the-retention-exception/"&gt;The retention exception&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://studiolegalevercelli.com/en/the-retention-exception/embed/#?secret=4lzJLgFUd8" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;The retention exception&#x201D; &#x2014; Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo" data-secret="4lzJLgFUd8" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Continuing in our discussion concerning the right of retention, it seems appropriate to deal with a question, relevant to doctrine and jurisprudence, namely whether the exception of retention can be asserted in the judgment of release or in execution, or indifferently in both. The traditional view, which goes back to Article 1152 of the Civil [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
