{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","provider_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","author_name":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","author_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/","title":"News Supreme Court rulings January 2013 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GERvsvAlmf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-january-2013\/\">News Supreme Court rulings January 2013<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-january-2013\/embed\/#?secret=GERvsvAlmf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;News Supreme Court rulings January 2013&#8221; &#8212; Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" data-secret=\"GERvsvAlmf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Even when stopping the vehicle is impossible, the ticket is still legitimate. The United Sections of the Supreme Court in ruling number 3936 of March 13, 2012, affirmed that following the ascertained exceeding of speed limits by means of the mobile speed camera, deferred contestation of inflation is permissible, as it is not necessary to [&hellip;]"}