{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","provider_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","author_name":"studio legale","author_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale\/","title":"News Supreme Court rulings November 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TXntAIRW3k\"><a href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-november-2016\/\">News Supreme Court rulings November 2016<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-november-2016\/embed\/#?secret=TXntAIRW3k\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;News Supreme Court rulings November 2016&#8221; &#8212; Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" data-secret=\"TXntAIRW3k\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Supreme Court: court documents must also be translated into Sardinian dialects The Supreme Court of Civil Cassation, in ruling no. 45216\/2016, ruled that the dialects into which the Sardinian language is divided also benefit from the constitutionally guaranteed rights of recognized linguistic minorities, with the result that procedural documents must also be translated under penalty [&hellip;]"}