{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","provider_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","author_name":"studio legale","author_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale\/","title":"Proceedings for injunction and settlement attempt | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0Dv8FjXulE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/proceedings-for-injunction-and-settlement-attempt\/\">Proceedings for injunction and settlement attempt<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/proceedings-for-injunction-and-settlement-attempt\/embed\/#?secret=0Dv8FjXulE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Proceedings for injunction and settlement attempt&#8221; &#8212; Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" data-secret=\"0Dv8FjXulE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"On the subject of debt recovery arising from agrarian contracts, specifically claims arising from non-payment of rent and ancillary charges, the Supreme Court has, recently, shed light on whether or not the prior attempt at conciliation is mandatory, as provided for in Article 46 l. 203\/82, subsequently amended by Article 11 d.lgs. 150\/2011, necessary if [&hellip;]"}