{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","provider_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","author_name":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","author_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/","title":"Retraction of inheritance (part two) | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XiGLfhQgT4\"><a href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/retraction-of-inheritance-part-two\/\">Retraction of inheritance (part two)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/retraction-of-inheritance-part-two\/embed\/#?secret=XiGLfhQgT4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Retraction of inheritance (part two)&#8221; &#8212; Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" data-secret=\"XiGLfhQgT4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Another problem relating to retraction is that inherent in the assertion (ref. Cass. Dec. 23, 1974, No. 4388) that transcription in favor of the third party does not prevent purchase in favor of the farmer who has exercised redemption after the date of transcription, this conclusion being motivated by the observation that the law, in [&hellip;]"}