{"id":3119,"date":"2017-04-13T18:59:02","date_gmt":"2017-04-13T16:59:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/"},"modified":"2024-07-12T18:41:56","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T16:41:56","slug":"news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"News Supreme Court rulings April 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><br \/>\n  <u>Supreme Court: bad weather can also constitute legitimate impediment<br \/>\n<\/u><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Supreme Court, in ruling no. 10157\/2016, ruled that when adverse weather conditions do not allow the lawyer to attend a hearing in chambers, the lawyer may rely on the legitimate excuse if his absence could potentially harm the defendant&#8217;s right of defense guaranteed by Articles 24 and 111 of the Constitution.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><br \/>\n  <u>If the dog has a dirty record, the owner is certainly guilty<br \/>\n<\/u><br \/>\n<\/strong>In ruling no. 10720\/2016, the Supreme Court has ruled that the owner of a dog who has already attacked a person in the past is always liable to conviction for failure to keep the animal in the event that the animal is again responsible for an aggression against another person.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">According to the Ermellini, what is decisive for the owner&#8217;s conviction is in fact the dog&#8217;s &#8220;history,&#8221; by virtue of which the man should have adopted an even more careful and prudent conduct in order to prevent further aggression.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><u>Cameras in the garage? The footage may be usable for investigative purposes<br \/>\n<\/u><\/strong>A recent ruling by the Supreme Court (No. 11419\/2016) shows that video recordings for investigative purposes made in the cash box of a garage are fully usable as evidence, as this place does not constitute &#8220;domicile&#8221; in the sense of private dwelling and as the filmed action can be freely observed by outsiders, since it is a place open to the public.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: bad weather can also constitute legitimate impediment The Supreme Court, in ruling no. 10157\/2016, ruled that when adverse weather conditions do not allow the lawyer to attend a hearing in chambers, the lawyer may rely on the legitimate excuse if his absence could potentially harm the defendant&#8217;s right of defense guaranteed by Articles [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1579],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>News Supreme Court rulings April 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"News Supreme Court rulings April 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: bad weather can also constitute legitimate impediment The Supreme Court, in ruling no. 10157\/2016, ruled that when adverse weather conditions do not allow the lawyer to attend a hearing in chambers, the lawyer may rely on the legitimate excuse if his absence could potentially harm the defendant&#8217;s right of defense guaranteed by Articles [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-04-13T16:59:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-12T16:41:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/\",\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings April 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-04-13T16:59:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-12T16:41:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings April 2016\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"description\":\"Law firm Vercelli\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21\",\"name\":\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"News Supreme Court rulings April 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"News Supreme Court rulings April 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","og_description":"Supreme Court: bad weather can also constitute legitimate impediment The Supreme Court, in ruling no. 10157\/2016, ruled that when adverse weather conditions do not allow the lawyer to attend a hearing in chambers, the lawyer may rely on the legitimate excuse if his absence could potentially harm the defendant&#8217;s right of defense guaranteed by Articles [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/","og_site_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","article_published_time":"2017-04-13T16:59:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-12T16:41:56+00:00","author":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/","name":"News Supreme Court rulings April 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-04-13T16:59:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-12T16:41:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-april-2016\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"News Supreme Court rulings April 2016"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","description":"Law firm Vercelli","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21","name":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo"},"url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3119"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3119"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3119\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3580,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3119\/revisions\/3580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3119"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3119"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}