{"id":3152,"date":"2017-04-03T15:37:37","date_gmt":"2017-04-03T13:37:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/"},"modified":"2024-07-12T18:45:19","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T16:45:19","slug":"news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/","title":{"rendered":"News Supreme Court rulings June 2013"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><br \/>\n  <u>Restaurant playground, no duty of supervision for the manager<br \/>\n<\/u><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Supreme Court in its May 21, 2013, ruling no. 12401, clarified that the owner of a restaurant that provides a perfectly good playground for young children is not obliged to provide a supervisory service related to the use of the play equipment provided. In fact, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the aforementioned service does not entail, on the part of the caterer, either the assumption of additional obligations beyond those assumed under the catering contract or determine any specific obligation to supervise the leisure activities of minors who use this service.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><br \/>\n  <u>It is not a crime to be an illegal parking attendant<br \/>\n<\/u><br \/>\n<\/strong>In Judgment 15936\/2013, the Supreme Court ruled that it is not a crime but, only, an administrative offense for a person to violate the order issued by the Questore ordering him to desist from engaging in certain conduct consisting, in the present case, in the activity of illegal valet parking near the municipal hospital.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><br \/>\n  <u>Loses ticket but still cashes in winnings: evidence by witnesses admitted<br \/>\n<\/u><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Supreme Court (Judgment No. 11774\/2013) ordered to pay the winnings of the player who, despite losing the ticket, had managed to prove the play, confirmed, by the way, by the report of lost coupons. This purchase, had been, as well, confirmed by the statement, signed by the same owner of the box office, whereby, the amount of the winnings claimed by the player was specified.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Restaurant playground, no duty of supervision for the manager The Supreme Court in its May 21, 2013, ruling no. 12401, clarified that the owner of a restaurant that provides a perfectly good playground for young children is not obliged to provide a supervisory service related to the use of the play equipment provided. In fact, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1579],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>News Supreme Court rulings June 2013 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"News Supreme Court rulings June 2013 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Restaurant playground, no duty of supervision for the manager The Supreme Court in its May 21, 2013, ruling no. 12401, clarified that the owner of a restaurant that provides a perfectly good playground for young children is not obliged to provide a supervisory service related to the use of the play equipment provided. In fact, [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-04-03T13:37:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-12T16:45:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/\",\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings June 2013 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-04-03T13:37:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-12T16:45:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings June 2013\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"description\":\"Law firm Vercelli\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21\",\"name\":\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"News Supreme Court rulings June 2013 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"News Supreme Court rulings June 2013 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","og_description":"Restaurant playground, no duty of supervision for the manager The Supreme Court in its May 21, 2013, ruling no. 12401, clarified that the owner of a restaurant that provides a perfectly good playground for young children is not obliged to provide a supervisory service related to the use of the play equipment provided. In fact, [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/","og_site_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","article_published_time":"2017-04-03T13:37:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-12T16:45:19+00:00","author":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/","name":"News Supreme Court rulings June 2013 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-04-03T13:37:37+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-12T16:45:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-june-2013\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"News Supreme Court rulings June 2013"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","description":"Law firm Vercelli","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21","name":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo"},"url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3152"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3152"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3152\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3166,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3152\/revisions\/3166"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}