{"id":3168,"date":"2017-04-03T16:42:11","date_gmt":"2017-04-03T14:42:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/"},"modified":"2024-07-12T18:45:17","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T16:45:17","slug":"news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"News Supreme Court rulings September 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><u>Private violence for those who park by blocking vehicle transit.<br \/>\n<\/u><\/strong>In ruling no. 32720\/2014 the Justices of legitimacy affirmed that the conduct, consisting of placing one&#8217;s vehicle at the entrance of the only way out of a fund, apt to preclude the freedom of transit of a vehicle, constitutes the crime of private violence under Article 610 of the Criminal Code.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Supreme Court specified that one who voluntarily obstructs the only way out in order to prevent free exit by others engages in conduct that is likely to restrict the personal freedom of the latter, who as a result of said conduct are &#8220;trapped&#8221; inside the fund.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><u>Valid termination for serious reason if neighbor&#8217;s dog barks too much.<br \/>\n<\/u><\/strong>The Supreme Court, in ruling no. 12291 of 2014, ruled that the continuous barking of a neighbor&#8217;s dog, which disturbs the quiet and one&#8217;s rest at night, can be considered a de facto nuisance caused by a third party and legitimizes the disturbed tenant to terminate the <a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.studiocataldi.it\/guide_legali\/locazioni\/la-locazione.asp\">lease<\/a> as the subject of harassment detrimental to health.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Supreme Court, in the aforementioned ruling, also reiterated that the serious reasons that allow, regardless of contractual provisions, the tenant&#8217;s termination of the <a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.studiocataldi.it\/guide_legali\/locazioni\/la-locazione.asp\">lease<\/a> must be determined by facts beyond his control, unforeseeable and supervening upon the establishment of the relationship, such as to make its continuation exceedingly burdensome for him.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><u>It is a crime to use someone else&#8217;s photo for your own account.<br \/>\n<\/u><\/strong>According to the Supreme Court of Cassation (Judgment No. 25774 of 2014) a person who, in order to maintain anonymity in the creation of his own profile, within any social network, uses the photos of another person can be charged with the crime of person substitution.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Indeed, the Supreme Court clarified that using another person&#8217;s photo for one&#8217;s account can be punishable under Article 494 of the Criminal Code, not mattering, moreover, the circumstance that a fictitious name was used in doing so. The Justices also clarified that substitution of person occurs whenever one takes an attitude to make himself appear as another.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Private violence for those who park by blocking vehicle transit. In ruling no. 32720\/2014 the Justices of legitimacy affirmed that the conduct, consisting of placing one&#8217;s vehicle at the entrance of the only way out of a fund, apt to preclude the freedom of transit of a vehicle, constitutes the crime of private violence under [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1579],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>News Supreme Court rulings September 2014 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"News Supreme Court rulings September 2014 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Private violence for those who park by blocking vehicle transit. In ruling no. 32720\/2014 the Justices of legitimacy affirmed that the conduct, consisting of placing one&#8217;s vehicle at the entrance of the only way out of a fund, apt to preclude the freedom of transit of a vehicle, constitutes the crime of private violence under [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-04-03T14:42:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-12T16:45:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/\",\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings September 2014 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-04-03T14:42:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-12T16:45:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings September 2014\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"description\":\"Law firm Vercelli\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21\",\"name\":\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"News Supreme Court rulings September 2014 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"News Supreme Court rulings September 2014 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","og_description":"Private violence for those who park by blocking vehicle transit. In ruling no. 32720\/2014 the Justices of legitimacy affirmed that the conduct, consisting of placing one&#8217;s vehicle at the entrance of the only way out of a fund, apt to preclude the freedom of transit of a vehicle, constitutes the crime of private violence under [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/","og_site_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","article_published_time":"2017-04-03T14:42:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-12T16:45:17+00:00","author":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/","name":"News Supreme Court rulings September 2014 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-04-03T14:42:11+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-12T16:45:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-september-2014\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"News Supreme Court rulings September 2014"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","description":"Law firm Vercelli","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21","name":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo"},"url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3168"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3168"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3168\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3219,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3168\/revisions\/3219"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}