{"id":3206,"date":"2018-10-19T18:17:17","date_gmt":"2018-10-19T16:17:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/"},"modified":"2024-07-12T18:39:47","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T16:39:47","slug":"news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"News Supreme Court rulings December 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><strong><u>Condominium: kindergarten banned, is noisy activity<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The Supreme Court of Civil Cassation, in ruling no. 24958\/2016, ruled that the daycare activity carried out in the apartment of the condominium must immediately cease if such activity exceeds the normal tolerable limits established on the subject of noise immissions by Art. 844 of the Civil Code and where the condominium regulations expressly prohibit the use of apartments for noisy exercises.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><strong><u>Clock shop theft: no compensation to the robbed customer if there is an alarm<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">From a recent Supreme Court ruling, no. 24627\/2016, it is inferred that the owner of a watch store is not liable to pay damages to the customer who was robbed in the store if he can prove in court that he has taken all exigible security measures and precautions to prevent theft, and in particular the presence of an efficient and fully functional alarm system.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><strong><u>Supreme Court: it is a crime to spread disinfectant to cover the smell of neighbor&#8217;s cats<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia, palatino, serif;\"><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">In ruling no. 46149\/2016, the Criminal Court of Cassation ruled that a person who spreads a noxious substance in an attempt to solve the problem of foul odors caused by felines is liable for the crime of dangerous throwing of things under Article 674 of the Criminal Code, as such substances can cause health problems for pet owners and others.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Condominium: kindergarten banned, is noisy activity The Supreme Court of Civil Cassation, in ruling no. 24958\/2016, ruled that the daycare activity carried out in the apartment of the condominium must immediately cease if such activity exceeds the normal tolerable limits established on the subject of noise immissions by Art. 844 of the Civil Code and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1579],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>News Supreme Court rulings December 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"News Supreme Court rulings December 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Condominium: kindergarten banned, is noisy activity The Supreme Court of Civil Cassation, in ruling no. 24958\/2016, ruled that the daycare activity carried out in the apartment of the condominium must immediately cease if such activity exceeds the normal tolerable limits established on the subject of noise immissions by Art. 844 of the Civil Code and [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-19T16:17:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-12T16:39:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"studio legale\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"studio legale\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/\",\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings December 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-19T16:17:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-12T16:39:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings December 2016\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"description\":\"Law firm Vercelli\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7\",\"name\":\"studio legale\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"studio legale\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"News Supreme Court rulings December 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"News Supreme Court rulings December 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","og_description":"Condominium: kindergarten banned, is noisy activity The Supreme Court of Civil Cassation, in ruling no. 24958\/2016, ruled that the daycare activity carried out in the apartment of the condominium must immediately cease if such activity exceeds the normal tolerable limits established on the subject of noise immissions by Art. 844 of the Civil Code and [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/","og_site_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","article_published_time":"2018-10-19T16:17:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-12T16:39:47+00:00","author":"studio legale","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"studio legale","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/","name":"News Supreme Court rulings December 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-19T16:17:17+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-12T16:39:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-december-2016\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"News Supreme Court rulings December 2016"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","description":"Law firm Vercelli","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7","name":"studio legale","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"studio legale"},"url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3206"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3206"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3206\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3576,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3206\/revisions\/3576"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}