{"id":3336,"date":"2020-06-30T09:41:28","date_gmt":"2020-06-30T07:41:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/"},"modified":"2024-07-12T18:30:21","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T16:30:21","slug":"news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/","title":{"rendered":"News Supreme Court Judgments April 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><u>Claim for compensation<em>&#8220;ex lege<\/em>&#8221; Pinto  <\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Judgment no. 5535 of 02\/28\/2020 of the Supreme Court ruled, in relation to the claim for<em>&#8220;ex lege<\/em>&#8221; Pinto compensation concerning criminal trials exceeding the reasonable duration as of October 31, 2016, that the submission of the request for acceleration in the prerequisite judgment is no longer a condition for the admissibility of the claim for equitable reparation, but may constitute a circumstantial element of a supervening lack or non-seriousness of the party&#8217;s interest in the decision of the appeal, being able to take on significance for the purposes of quantifying the compensation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><u>Inclusion in the civil status act of a minor<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Supreme Court, in Order no. 8325 of 04\/29\/2020, declared relevant and not manifestly unfounded the question of constitutional legitimacy of the norms that do not allow, due to contrast with the Italian public order, that the foreign court order concerning the inclusion in the civil status act of a child, procreated by the methods of gestation for others (so-called surrogacy), of the non-biological intended parent can be recognized and declared enforceable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><u>Reducing the minimum age gap of 18 years between the adopter and the adopted person  <\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In Judgment no. 7667 of 03\/04\/2020, the Supreme Court, on the subject of the adoption of an adult, ruled that the judge in applying the rule requiring the minimum age gap of 18 years between the adopter and the adoptee, must proceed to an interpretation of Article 291 of the Civil Code compatible with Article 30 Const, according to the reading given by the Constitutional Court and in relation to Article 8 of the ECHR, which allows, having regard to the circumstances of the concrete case, a reasonable reduction of this minimum age gap, in order to protect long-established family situations based on a proven &#8220;<em>affectio familiaris<\/em>&#8220;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Claim for compensation&#8220;ex lege&#8221; Pinto The Judgment no. 5535 of 02\/28\/2020 of the Supreme Court ruled, in relation to the claim for&#8220;ex lege&#8221; Pinto compensation concerning criminal trials exceeding the reasonable duration as of October 31, 2016, that the submission of the request for acceleration in the prerequisite judgment is no longer a condition for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1579],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>News Supreme Court Judgments April 2020 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"News Supreme Court Judgments April 2020 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Claim for compensation&#8220;ex lege&#8221; Pinto The Judgment no. 5535 of 02\/28\/2020 of the Supreme Court ruled, in relation to the claim for&#8220;ex lege&#8221; Pinto compensation concerning criminal trials exceeding the reasonable duration as of October 31, 2016, that the submission of the request for acceleration in the prerequisite judgment is no longer a condition for [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-06-30T07:41:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-12T16:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"studio legale\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"studio legale\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/\",\"name\":\"News Supreme Court Judgments April 2020 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-30T07:41:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-12T16:30:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News Supreme Court Judgments April 2020\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"description\":\"Law firm Vercelli\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7\",\"name\":\"studio legale\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"studio legale\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"News Supreme Court Judgments April 2020 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"News Supreme Court Judgments April 2020 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","og_description":"Claim for compensation&#8220;ex lege&#8221; Pinto The Judgment no. 5535 of 02\/28\/2020 of the Supreme Court ruled, in relation to the claim for&#8220;ex lege&#8221; Pinto compensation concerning criminal trials exceeding the reasonable duration as of October 31, 2016, that the submission of the request for acceleration in the prerequisite judgment is no longer a condition for [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/","og_site_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","article_published_time":"2020-06-30T07:41:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-12T16:30:21+00:00","author":"studio legale","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"studio legale","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/","name":"News Supreme Court Judgments April 2020 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-06-30T07:41:28+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-12T16:30:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-april-2020\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"News Supreme Court Judgments April 2020"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","description":"Law firm Vercelli","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7","name":"studio legale","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"studio legale"},"url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3336"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3336"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3336\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3378,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3336\/revisions\/3378"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}