{"id":3341,"date":"2018-10-19T19:09:46","date_gmt":"2018-10-19T17:09:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/"},"modified":"2024-07-12T18:30:17","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T16:30:17","slug":"news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2018"},"content":{"rendered":"

No maintenance to ex-spouse who unreasonably rejects job offers<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

Loses maintenance allowance to ex-wife who unreasonably refuses job offers: a spouse’s aptitude for work as a potential earning capacity is an assessable factor in matters pertaining to maintenance allowance.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court has made it clear that a spouse’s aptitude for work is established where an actual possibility of performing paid work is found.<\/p>\n

Cheating for spitefulness lawful: separation charge goes to first cheater<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

Separation should still be charged to the unfaithful husband who originally cheated on his wife, even though the latter, after discovering it, pursued an affair with another man out of spite: it was the original unfaithfulness of the partner that led to the “breakdown” of the marital relationship.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court, in ruling no. 3318\/2017, thus ruled on the case at hand, establishing that the woman’s encounters with another man had been subsequent to her discovery of her husband’s affair, his final abandonment of the marital home, and the filing of the separation petition.<\/p>\n

Keeping animals in chains is a crime<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

According to the Supreme Court, keeping animals in chains is a crime, since it is a situation that is, on the one hand, incompatible with their nature and, on the other hand, productive of severe suffering towards them.<\/p>\n

In pronouncement no. 10164\/2018, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction against a circus operator responsible for holding five elephants with chains that restricted even their most basic movements.<\/p>\n

The judges went on to note that the use of chains is permitted only as an exception, in those cases in which it is necessary to provide for the health care and welfare needs of the animal, as well as the safety of the operators, and, in any case, only for the period in which such tasks must be performed.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

No maintenance to ex-spouse who unreasonably rejects job offers Loses maintenance allowance to ex-wife who unreasonably refuses job offers: a spouse’s aptitude for work as a potential earning capacity is an assessable factor in matters pertaining to maintenance allowance. The Supreme Court has made it clear that a spouse’s aptitude for work is established where […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1579],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nNews Supreme Court Judgments March 2018 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2018 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"No maintenance to ex-spouse who unreasonably rejects job offers Loses maintenance allowance to ex-wife who unreasonably refuses job offers: a spouse’s aptitude for work as a potential earning capacity is an assessable factor in matters pertaining to maintenance allowance. The Supreme Court has made it clear that a spouse’s aptitude for work is established where […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-19T17:09:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-12T16:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"studio legale\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"studio legale\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/\",\"name\":\"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2018 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-19T17:09:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-12T16:30:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2018\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"description\":\"Law firm Vercelli\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7\",\"name\":\"studio legale\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"studio legale\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2018 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2018 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","og_description":"No maintenance to ex-spouse who unreasonably rejects job offers Loses maintenance allowance to ex-wife who unreasonably refuses job offers: a spouse’s aptitude for work as a potential earning capacity is an assessable factor in matters pertaining to maintenance allowance. The Supreme Court has made it clear that a spouse’s aptitude for work is established where […]","og_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/","og_site_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","article_published_time":"2018-10-19T17:09:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-12T16:30:17+00:00","author":"studio legale","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"studio legale","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/","name":"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2018 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-19T17:09:46+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-12T16:30:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2018\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2018"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","description":"Law firm Vercelli","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7","name":"studio legale","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"studio legale"},"url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3341"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3341"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3341\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3354,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3341\/revisions\/3354"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}