{"id":3361,"date":"2018-10-19T18:25:22","date_gmt":"2018-10-19T16:25:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/"},"modified":"2024-07-12T18:30:13","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T16:30:13","slug":"news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><u>Condominium: leaving garbage in the common yard is a crime<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Supreme Court of Cassation, in ruling no. 2754\/2017, clarified that accumulating garbage and dirt in the courtyard of an apartment building constitutes the crime of harassment and nuisance to persons under Article 660 of the Criminal Code, unless the courtyard is for exclusive use.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><u>Raising dust in renovation work is a crime<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">From a recent Supreme Court ruling, no. 10005\/2017, it is inferred that the director of a construction company who does not prevent, in the course of renovation construction work, the lifting of a significant amount of dust is punishable by arrest for up to two months or a fine of 548.00 to 2,192.00 euros (pursuant to Articles 153 paragraph 5 and 159 paragraph 2 letter c) of Legislative Decree No. 81\/2008), unless such conduct has caused minor harm and has not in any case resulted in risks to hygiene and safety in the workplace.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><u>Preventing your neighbor from parking by using a plastic gun is a crime<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to a recent Supreme Court ruling, no. 2532\/2017, a person who, wielding a plastic gun, prevents his neighbor from parking his car in the condominium yard is liable to conviction for the crime of aggravated menacing under Article 612 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, even if the weapon is not pointed directly at the neighbor and if the threatening phrases are not expressly directed at the neighbor, since such conduct, as a whole, undoubtedly takes on a concrete intimidating value.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Condominium: leaving garbage in the common yard is a crime The Supreme Court of Cassation, in ruling no. 2754\/2017, clarified that accumulating garbage and dirt in the courtyard of an apartment building constitutes the crime of harassment and nuisance to persons under Article 660 of the Criminal Code, unless the courtyard is for exclusive use. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1579],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>News Supreme Court Judgments March 2017 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2017 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Condominium: leaving garbage in the common yard is a crime The Supreme Court of Cassation, in ruling no. 2754\/2017, clarified that accumulating garbage and dirt in the courtyard of an apartment building constitutes the crime of harassment and nuisance to persons under Article 660 of the Criminal Code, unless the courtyard is for exclusive use. [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-19T16:25:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-12T16:30:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"studio legale\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"studio legale\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/\",\"name\":\"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2017 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-19T16:25:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-12T16:30:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2017\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"description\":\"Law firm Vercelli\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7\",\"name\":\"studio legale\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"studio legale\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2017 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2017 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","og_description":"Condominium: leaving garbage in the common yard is a crime The Supreme Court of Cassation, in ruling no. 2754\/2017, clarified that accumulating garbage and dirt in the courtyard of an apartment building constitutes the crime of harassment and nuisance to persons under Article 660 of the Criminal Code, unless the courtyard is for exclusive use. [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/","og_site_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","article_published_time":"2018-10-19T16:25:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-12T16:30:13+00:00","author":"studio legale","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"studio legale","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/","name":"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2017 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-19T16:25:22+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-12T16:30:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-judgments-march-2017\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"News Supreme Court Judgments March 2017"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","description":"Law firm Vercelli","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be3bcd73f63e1e0cfabab4bdcc4985c7","name":"studio legale","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/29b65e06f3d95703ea81fb94c2808d49?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"studio legale"},"url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3361"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3361"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3361\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3362,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3361\/revisions\/3362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3361"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3361"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3361"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}