{"id":3389,"date":"2017-04-13T18:57:49","date_gmt":"2017-04-13T16:57:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/"},"modified":"2024-07-12T18:30:07","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T16:30:07","slug":"news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"News Supreme Court rulings March 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><u>Radio blasting in the car? It is a crime<br \/>\n<\/u><\/strong>A recent ruling by the Supreme Court (No. 7543\/2016) shows that driving around the city with the sound on a thousand integrates the crime of disturbing the occupations and rest of people under Art. 659 of the Criminal Code.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">The judges of legitimacy, with in the aforementioned ruling, moreover clarified that the judge, in assessing the actual suitability of sound emissions to cause harm to an indeterminate number of people, may not only order the performance of specific technical investigations, but also base his conviction on<em> &#8220;other evidence capable of demonstrating the existence of a phenomenon capable of objectively causing disturbance to the public peace<\/em>.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><br \/>\n  <u>Occupying the school is twice a crime<br \/>\n<\/u><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Supreme Court, in ruling no. 7084\/2016, ruled that those who occupy a school by preventing teachers and students opposed to the same occupation from entering the facility are liable to conviction for the crimes of private violence and disruption of public service.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Indeed, the Ermellini made it clear that the exercise of fundamental rights, such as those to strike, assemble and manifest thought,<em>&#8220;ceases to be legitimate when it overflows into the injury of other constitutionally guaranteed interests<\/em>,&#8221; such as the right to study.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><br \/>\n  <u>Insulting the traffic auxiliary is not contempt of public official<br \/>\n<\/u><br \/>\n<\/strong>In ruling no. 6880\/2016, the Supreme Court recently clarified that insulting the traffic auxiliary does not constitute the offense of contempt of a public official, but that of insult under Article 594 of the Criminal Code.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Indeed, the courts of legitimacy have clarified that the traffic auxiliary, when ascertaining and contesting violations pertaining to the prohibition of parking in the licensed areas, should not be considered a public official, but a mere public service officer.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Radio blasting in the car? It is a crime A recent ruling by the Supreme Court (No. 7543\/2016) shows that driving around the city with the sound on a thousand integrates the crime of disturbing the occupations and rest of people under Art. 659 of the Criminal Code. The judges of legitimacy, with in the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1579],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>News Supreme Court rulings March 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"News Supreme Court rulings March 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Radio blasting in the car? It is a crime A recent ruling by the Supreme Court (No. 7543\/2016) shows that driving around the city with the sound on a thousand integrates the crime of disturbing the occupations and rest of people under Art. 659 of the Criminal Code. The judges of legitimacy, with in the [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-04-13T16:57:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-12T16:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/\",\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings March 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-04-13T16:57:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-12T16:30:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings March 2016\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"description\":\"Law firm Vercelli\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21\",\"name\":\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"News Supreme Court rulings March 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"News Supreme Court rulings March 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","og_description":"Radio blasting in the car? It is a crime A recent ruling by the Supreme Court (No. 7543\/2016) shows that driving around the city with the sound on a thousand integrates the crime of disturbing the occupations and rest of people under Art. 659 of the Criminal Code. The judges of legitimacy, with in the [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/","og_site_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","article_published_time":"2017-04-13T16:57:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-12T16:30:07+00:00","author":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/","name":"News Supreme Court rulings March 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-04-13T16:57:49+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-12T16:30:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-march-2016\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"News Supreme Court rulings March 2016"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","description":"Law firm Vercelli","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21","name":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo"},"url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3389"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3389"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3389\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3410,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3389\/revisions\/3410"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}