{"id":3396,"date":"2017-04-13T19:13:32","date_gmt":"2017-04-13T17:13:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/"},"modified":"2024-07-12T18:30:07","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T16:30:07","slug":"news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"News Supreme Court rulings May 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><br \/>\n  <u>Stealing a pair of slippers from the gym is aggravated theft<br \/>\n<\/u><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Fourth Criminal Section of the Supreme Court, in ruling no. 17001\/2016, ruled that attempting to steal a pair of flip-flops from a gymnasium can constitute the <a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.studiocataldi.it\/guide-diritto-penale\/furto.asp\">crime of<\/a> grand <a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.studiocataldi.it\/guide-diritto-penale\/furto.asp\">theft<\/a>.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Indeed, the courts of legitimacy have made it clear that the aggravating circumstance of exposing property to the public faith can be found whenever surveillance over a place is exercised in a noncontinuous manner and in such a way as to be incapable of preventing free access to it by the public.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><br \/>\n  <u>Spying on others&#8217; emails is a crime<br \/>\n<\/u><br \/>\n<\/strong>A recent ruling by the Supreme Court (No. 13057\/2016) shows that spying on someone else&#8217;s password-protected e-mail box in order to view the messages contained therein constitutes the crime of abusive access to a computer system under Art. 615-ter of the Criminal Code, since such conduct clearly reveals the intention to violate a confidential and exclusive computer space.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><br \/>\n  <u>Supreme Court: speeding fines void if the driver&#8217;s state of necessity is proven<br \/>\n<\/u><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Civil Court of Cassation, in ruling 7198\/2016, has ruled that a speeding fine should be annulled if the state of necessity of the driver of the vehicle has been confirmed by the emergency room certificate and several res judgments that have passed res judicata annulling other fines issued in connection with the same matter.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Stealing a pair of slippers from the gym is aggravated theft The Fourth Criminal Section of the Supreme Court, in ruling no. 17001\/2016, ruled that attempting to steal a pair of flip-flops from a gymnasium can constitute the crime of grand theft. Indeed, the courts of legitimacy have made it clear that the aggravating circumstance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1579],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>News Supreme Court rulings May 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"News Supreme Court rulings May 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Stealing a pair of slippers from the gym is aggravated theft The Fourth Criminal Section of the Supreme Court, in ruling no. 17001\/2016, ruled that attempting to steal a pair of flip-flops from a gymnasium can constitute the crime of grand theft. Indeed, the courts of legitimacy have made it clear that the aggravating circumstance [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-04-13T17:13:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-12T16:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/\",\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings May 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-04-13T17:13:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-12T16:30:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News Supreme Court rulings May 2016\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"description\":\"Law firm Vercelli\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21\",\"name\":\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"News Supreme Court rulings May 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"News Supreme Court rulings May 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","og_description":"Stealing a pair of slippers from the gym is aggravated theft The Fourth Criminal Section of the Supreme Court, in ruling no. 17001\/2016, ruled that attempting to steal a pair of flip-flops from a gymnasium can constitute the crime of grand theft. Indeed, the courts of legitimacy have made it clear that the aggravating circumstance [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/","og_site_name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","article_published_time":"2017-04-13T17:13:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-12T16:30:07+00:00","author":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/","name":"News Supreme Court rulings May 2016 | Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-04-13T17:13:32+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-12T16:30:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/news-supreme-court-rulings-may-2016\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"News Supreme Court rulings May 2016"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/","name":"Law firm Randazzo e Roncarolo","description":"Law firm Vercelli","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8b0b860d2b7601ca6a4311f242de2a21","name":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4f932909c7270f43610ba542ce7297f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Studio Legale Randazzo e Roncarolo"},"url":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/author\/studio-legale-randazzo-e-roncarolo\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3396"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3396"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3396\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3427,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3396\/revisions\/3427"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studiolegalevercelli.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}